The virus hoax

Source: https://parentofsociety.com/tag/coronavirus

Here we go… This is going to be a very long article, but I think it’s very important for the world to see this amidst this “pandemic”.

It’s apparently the end of the world as we know it because everyone is scared of catching COVID-19 ie super coronavirus (yes I coined that term).

The grocery stores in my area are running low on supplies, and all the restaurants in the area have their lobby closed so nobody can eat inside.
Also, according to the internet some places are implementing quarantine procedures across the globe.

This should be complete insanity to anyone that has been around for more than a couple decades.

While I do not doubt that some people are getting “sick” and of those, some are actually dying. But is this happening as a RESULT of catching a virus?

A couple days ago I heard about something that completely blew my mind, germ theory. Of course I had heard of germs before, and knew that they could get people sick and in some cases kill them, but is this true?

The thing that originally caught my attention is the fact that it is still called Germ THEORY. If it were indeed true, wouldn’t they remove the theory part from it and call it something else instead of Germ Theory?

Germ Theory

According to Wikipedia…

Way back in the middle ages there were many different physicians that proposed the idea of germs being the cause of disease and sickness but it really didn’t start taking off until Louis Pasteur 8 came into the picture which was basically the first advocate for pasteurization (hence the name) and germ theory.

A transitional period began in the late 1850s with the work of Louis Pasteur 8. This work was later extended by Robert Koch 4 in the 1880s. Viruses were discovered in the 1890s. By the end of the 1880s, the miasma theory was struggling to compete with the germ theory of disease. Eventually, a “golden era” of bacteriology 2 ensued, during which the theory quickly led to the identification of the actual organisms that cause many diseases

So if this is the “the currently accepted scientific theory 2 for many diseases (Wikipedia)” then why these use of words?

You’ll begin to see lots of things with wording like this once you start questioning everything. Why wouldn’t it say that it is fact if it were, or that it is universally accepted?

This is what a theory that has been proven to be true looks like on Wikipedia…

Before the germ theory was accepted by the medical and scientific community, there were many different ideas about how disease happened, one of them is called “Terrain Theory”.

Terrain Theory (Microzymian Theory)

The following is the entire page on Wikipedia.

The terrain theory is the theory of disease 2proposed by Antoine Béchamp 6 that a diseased body, the “terrain”, will attract germs 1to come as scavengers of the weakened or poorly defended tissue. Béchamp believed that the pH of the body is important, and that an acidic pH will attract germs and an alkaline 4pH will repel them.

In modern science, germ theory 1 as developed by Louis Pasteur 8 has been the scientific consensus 3 for many years. Germ theory states that microorganisms, bacteria, virus and fungi, are the cause of most diseases. It is the cornerstone of modern medicine and treatment of disease, while Terrain Theory is now medically obsolete.[1] 2

They don’t really go into depth about how terrain theory really works, instead they only give two sentences before promoting germ theory.

Here’s a little about the creator of this theory

Antoine Béchamp

From Wikipedia…

Pierre Jacques Antoine Béchamp (October 16, 1816 – April 15, 1908) was a French scientist now best known for breakthroughs in applied organic chemistry 1 and for a bitter rivalry with Louis Pasteur.[1] Béchamp developed the Béchamp reduction, an inexpensive method to produce aniline dye, permitting Perkin to launch the synthetic-dye industry. Béchamp also synthesized the first organic arsenical 1 drug, arsanilic acid 1, from which Ehrlich 2 later synthesized the first chemotherapeutic drug 1.

Béchamp’s rivalry with Pasteur was initially for priority in attributing fermentation 2 to microorganisms, later for attributing the silkworm disease pebrine 1 to microorganisms, and eventually over the validity of germ theory 1.[1][2] 1 Béchamp also disputed cell theory 6.

Claiming discovery that the “molecular granulations” in biological fluids were actually the elementary units of life, Béchamp named them microzymas —that is, “tiny enzymes”—and credited them with producing both enzymes and cells while “evolving” amid favorable conditions into multicellular organisms. Denying that bacteria could invade a healthy animal and cause disease, Béchamp claimed instead that unfavorable host and environmental conditions destabilize the host’s native microzymas, whereupon they decompose host tissue by producing pathogenic bacteria. While cell theory and germ theory gained widespread acceptance, granular theories became obscure. Béchamp’s version, microzymian theory , has been retained by small groups, especially in alternative medicine 2.[2] 1

Alright now that I’ve laid out a bit of information for everyone to get acquainted to the players here, let’s dive into it.

What The Research Says

If you were to google “germ theory false 1” you’d see lots of different places criticizing Béchamp, places like wired.com 4 calling him a “crank” and a few random places will actually attempt to give out some accurate information about the subject.

I’m not exactly sure where I found my first big clue regarding this, but it led me to this old book.


this book is over $150 on amazon, why is that?

So I did some more searching and I was able to find a book that is closer to the original, it is called “Béchamp of Pastuer?” Here’s a link.

bechamp-or-pasteur-a-lost-chapter-in-history-of-biology.pdf 9 (1.3 MB)

The first part that caught my eye in this book was a reference to Florence Nightengale. In this book, it is claimed that long before Pastuer came along people knew a thing or two about disease and germs.

“Florence Nightingale, published an attack on the idea in 1860, over 17 years before Pasteur adopted it and claimed it as his own.

She said of ‘infection’:

“Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions, growing out of one another.

Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves?

I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been ‘caught’, but must have begun.

I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and turn into one another. Now, dogs do not turn into cats. I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut. Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):

  • True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence a true nurse either asks or needs.
  • Wise and humane management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness.
  • The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”

Here you have Florence Nightingale, the most famous nurse in history, after life-long experience with infection, contagion and epidemics, challenging the germ theory 17 years before Pasteur put it forward as his own discovery – Bechamp or Pastuer? 9

So wait a minute… People can’t spread disease to each other?

s I mentioned in the previous article viruses are not the cause of disease and sickness. Béchamp attributed disease and sickness to a process similar to fermentation. Meaning that the conditions must be ideal in order for a mutation to happen, that we already have the necessary ingredients in our body for viruses to develop.

The viruses are a cleaning mechanism for the body to rid the body of toxins. Vonderplanitz describes them as soap or a solvent to clean out the toxins. They are our friends, they are helping your body eliminate toxins in order to heal.

If you haven’t already checked it out, here’s the first of the series.

So What Actually Causes Disease?

Under the “currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases” Germ Theory will tell us that any and everyone is susceptible to these microscopic living things that are able to float around and infect our bodies, unless you get a vaccine of course!

That there are literally an infinite amount of these, and that each one is particular to a specific disease.

This is obviously very lucrative to the people who have a stake in the medical business, especially the vaccine manufacturers. But I will present some information that will help

Here is a table comparing Germ Theory and Terrain Theory (Microzymian Theory, commonly labeled Cellular Theory)

Anything Else?

So I have addressed the Germ Theory in the previous articles, now it is time to shed some light on probably the most profitable portion of the entire thing, Vaccination.

In 2017, Pharmacuetical company GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) pulled in $7.16 Billion, besting Merck’s $6.5 billion, Sanofi’s $6.25 billion and Pfizer’s $6 billion. That comes to a total of $25.91 BILLION and this isn’t even all of the companies making them, just the top few.

The amount of “recommended” vaccines is increasing practically every year.

vaccinetable

  • Now by age 2 a child can recieve a total of up to 27. 2
  • By the age of 18, the recommended number of vaccines is 51. 2

As a medical man I look upon vaccination as an insult to common sense, as superstitious in its origin, unscientific in theory and practice, and useless and dangerous in its character. – Dr Walter Hawden

All ‘conspiracy theories’ aside… This is a very lucrative business to be in, and it is important to consider the main goal of a corporation, and that is to continously increase profits. To survive.

It is very important to understand, that when a corporation is created, it becomes it’s own legal entity. By definition… a person 2

This means that they get a few benefits compared to you or me if being tried in court. What I am mainly getting at here is that no matter what this person 2 (corporation) does, it’s likely nobody will ever go to jail. At least not in the United States or Europe.

But this is a whole different article, so let’s get back to Vaccines.

The “Official” History On Vaccines

According to the “official” story…

It is all reported to have started back in 1796 with Edward Jenner and his discovery of a way to vaccinate for smallpox. Jenner reportedly noticed that milkmaids tending to cows never got smallpox after they had been infected with cowpox. Cowpox usually was a lot milder of a disease in humans compared to smallpox which caused severe skin eruptions and dangerous fevers in humans.

smallpoxhand

On May 14, 1796, Jenner took some puss that was squeezed out of a lesion on Sarah Nelms Hand (Actual Picture Above) and scratched it into the skin of 8 year old boy James Phipps, it is reported that a single blister rose up on the spot, but that James soon recovered. Then on July 1, Jenner inoculated the boy again, this time with smallpox matter, and no disease developed. Then doctors all over Europe soon adopted Jenner’s ‘innovative’ technique

The REAL History Of Vaccines (Variolation or Inoculation)

The facts here are that the original name for vaccination wasn’t always vaccination, the name was changed fairly recently after Jenner was PUT into the spotlight for his work . The original names for vaccination were variolation and inoculation.

The earliest hints of the practice of inoculation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. The Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the fifteenth century.

They implemented a method of “nasal insufflation” administered by blowing powdered smallpox material, usually scabs, up the nostrils. – Wikipedia: Vaccine

Understanding what I do now about the immune system, I feel like this insufflation method of administration could actually work like they’re supposed to, or at least better than the ones they use today. But the main point here is that vaccination is usually believed to be a fairly recent technology, but in fact it actually appears as if it’s been around for literally a millennium .

There are letters dating back to the 1600’s that were published in 1722 that describe variolation, but the first publication of these letters was in 1714.

It wasn’t until Dr. Emmanuel Timoni of Constantinople promoted the practice that variolation began its spread through Western Europe. After coming across the practice in Constantinople, Timoni wrote a letter describing the method in detail which was later published in the Philosophical Transactions in early 1714.

But that wouldn’t be enough to make this a mainstream thing, they needed to somehow get the public on board.

The First Use Of A “Celebrity” To Promote Variolation (Vaccination)

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, was wife to the British ambassador to Turkey, a letter writer and a poet. It is said that she was a smallpox survivor but the disease left her face disfigured, and that she lost her brother to the disease.

While in Turkey she came across the process of variolation as it was practiced amongst the people of Constantinople. She first mentioned variolation in the famous letter to her friend, Sarah Chiswell, in April 1717. in which she enthusiastically recounted the process, which in Constantinople was most commonly administered by experienced elderly women. In 1718, she had the practice conducted on her five-year-old son, Edward Montagu. The procedure was supervised by the embassy doctor Charles Maitland 1.

On her return to England, she had her four-year-old daughter inoculated in the presence of physicians of the royal court in 1721. Both variolations proved successful. Later on that year Maitland conducted an experimental inoculation of six prisoners within the Newgate Prison of London. In the experiment, six condemned prisoners were variolated and later exposed to smallpox with the promise of freedom if they survived. The experiment was a success, and soon variolation was drawing attention from the royal family, who helped promote the procedure throughout England. However, variolation caused the death of Prince Octavius of Great Britain, eighth son and thirteenth child of King George in 1783.

This is the official story on Wikipedia, although according to a publication on NCBI, only 1 of the 6 was actually exposed to smallpox.

the procedure was tested on six condemned prisoners who were promised amnesty if they survived. They all survived; one of them was even exposed to patients with active smallpox to demonstrate immunity. – The myth of the medical breakthrough: smallpox, vaccination, and Jenner reconsidered. 6

This may seem irrelevant, but I think it should be noted that Wikipedia is KNOWN to change whatever it sees fit, in order to purvey a narrative.

Continuing…

This was just the push the “medical establishment” needed in order to gain support from the people. But I think the most important part is what happened after this whole publicity stunt. The process needed to be perceived as something that wasn’t able to be done by just anyone, so they had to introduce a few extra steps in order to be able to cash in on it.

Despite opposition, variolation established itself as a mainstream medical treatment across England. Part of its success was founded on statistical observation, which confirmed that variolation was a safer alternative to contracting smallpox naturally, strengthened by the assumption that it protected against the disease for life. The major faults of variolation lay within its simplicity. Doctors sought to monopolize the simple treatment by convincing the public that the procedure could only be done by a trained professional. The procedure was now preceded by a severe bloodletting, in which the patient was bled, often to faintness, in order to ‘purify’ the blood and prevent fever. Doctors also began to favor deep incisions, which also discouraged amateurs. – Wikipedia: Variolation 1

This is a good example of the medical system manipulating their patients in order to cash in on it as much as possible, without regard to the patients.

I’m fairly certain the only reason that variolation isn’t usually mentioned when discussing the real history of vaccines is because it got a really bad reputation in the years leading up to Jenner.

Jenner is portrayed as a hero because he saved an 8 year old boy from smallpox. But there’s a little more to be said about “Dr” Edward Jenner.

More often than not, when looking into this fellow. He is portrayed as the father of vaccines, and a hero. Way back in 1796, he did after all, save that 8 year old boy, James Phipps.

But this wasn’t the full story. Jenner was actually inoculated when HE was an 8 year old boy. So I’m not even sure whether or not I should believe it…

In 1757, an 8-year-old boy was inoculated with smallpox in Gloucester; he was one of thousands of children inoculated that year in England. The procedure was effective, as the boy developed a mild case of smallpox and was subsequently immune to the disease. His name was Edward Jenner. – NCBI: Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox vaccination 2

This is strange because in all the official places (Wikipedia), this is completely overlooked. He didn’t just magically come up with this “breakthrough” at all. He was just the first to call this process vaccination .

Another pretty important and completely overlooked part of Jenner’s story is that he didn’t even pass the tests needed to get his medical degree. He purchased it (which apparently was so common back then that Wikipedia doesn’t mention it at all) and then applied to Oxford using that purchased degree.

Jenner did not take any examinations to receive his medical degree, but purchased a medical degree in 1792, from a Scottish University, the University of St. Andrews, and subsequently would apply for a degree from Oxford University, which he was granted – NewWorldEncyclopedia 2, Encyclopedia of Public Health 2002

As far as I’m concerned, this guy is a fraud just like Pastuer. The reason that the terms variolation and vaccination were seperated is because there was quite a bit of controversy associated with variolation and the “celebrities” known for the practice.

So how did it become mainstream?

Cotton Mather and Dr. Zabdiel Boylston

Cotton Mather was a reverend who was very interested in science and medicine. A ship from the West Indies brought a boatload of people that were sick with smallpox, and Mather had heard of variolation, so he wrote a letter and requested it immediately, the only doctor that responded was Boylston.

Mather, a graduate of Harvard College, was always very interested in science and medicine. When a ship from the West Indies carried persons sick with smallpox into Boston in 1721, an epidemic broke out in Boston and other parts of Massachusetts. Mather wrote a cautious letter recommending immediate variolation. However, he persuaded only Dr. Boylston. With Mather’s support, Boylston immediately started a variolation program and continued to inoculate many volunteers, despite many adversaries in both the public and the medical community in Boston. As the disease spread, so did the controversy around Mather and Boylston (12). At the height of the epidemic, a bomb was thrown into Mather’s house.

Now I’m going to emphasize that last sentence again…

At the height of the epidemic, a bomb was thrown into Mather’s house.

Why you ask?

It was because variolation had already had a reputation for spreading disease and killing lots of people even before he brought it to the “New World”.

In Europe, where the medical profession was relatively organized, the new methods of variolation became known quickly among physicians. Since there was also a demand for protection against smallpox, physicians soon began the variolation procedure on a massive scale. Although 2% to 3% of variolated persons died from the disease, became the source of another epidemic, or suffered from diseases (e.g., tuberculosis and syphilis) transmitted by the procedure itself, variolation rapidly gained popularity among both aristocratic and common people in Europe. – NCBI: Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox vaccination 2

The publication goes on to say that the death rate was 10 times lower than it was for people that contracted the disease naturally, but I will bring common sense and logic to the table.

If this was SO MUCH better than contracting the disease naturally, then why the hell would people throw a bomb into Mather’s house?!

They didn’t have hospitals with computers and internet to properly document probably even 10% (being generous) of the actual number of natural smallpox cases. I know that I didn’t go rushing to the hospital to report that I had the flu, or food poisoning, or anything else for that matter unless i literally had bones sticking out of my body.

The publication goes on further to say that after the whole bomb incident, they decided it was time to do an actual study comparing the case-fatality rates for variolated smallpox and natural smallpox. This study was done during “The Great” epidemic of 1721. Keep in mind that the bomb was reportedly thrown into his house at the height of this epidemic.

To make their point, Mather and Boylston used a statistical approach to compare the mortality rate of natural smallpox infection with that contracted by variolation. During the great epidemic of 1721, approximately half of Boston’s 12,000 citizens contracted smallpox. The fatality rate for the naturally contracted disease was 14%, whereas Boylston and Mather reported a mortality rate of only 2% among variolated individuals. This may have been the first time that comparative analysis was used to evaluate a medical procedure. – NCBI: Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox vaccination 2

So, a boat arrives in 1721 in Boston, and with it a smallpox epidemic. During this epidemic, Mather contacts Boylston, gets him to variolate tons of people, after this a bomb is thrown into his house, then they decide they need to actually do the work and figure out the statistics. ALL IN 1721!

This does not seem like a long enough time to figure out the actual case-fatality rates, and if it were truly as good as it sounded, then nobody would have bombed the damn reverends house. He would have been praised as a bringer of life, or whatever.

The New World Vaccination

SalkatPitt

So from all of this unmentioned backstory that I have outlined here, variolation was brought to the New World about 70 years before Jenner came along with vaccination (variolation evolved!) and the only reason the name was changed into something other than variolation, was simply to usher it into a new era.

To disguise it. I’m sure the older population faught kicking and screaming to the new generation and described the horrors of variolation. But under this new name, the younger generation welcomed it with open arms.

In the next in this series I will outline the MANY instances where mandatory vaccination has been enforced around the globe world, and the repurcusions that came along with it.

Maybe we can actually prevent this from happening again, we are at a crucial point in history with all this coronavirus nonsense…

“In 1910, at the Mayo Biological Laboratories, Dr. Rosenow began a series of experiments in which he took bacterial strains from many different disease sources, such as peurperal sepsis, arthritis, tonsillitis, and cow’s milk and put them into one culture of uniform media”

“After a while, there was no difference between the germs; they became all one class. Dr. Rosenow therefore concluded there was no particularly fixed species of different germs and they all had the capacity to change their structure with the changes in their nutriments.” Walene James: Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth 41

This experiment completely contradicts the model of the germ theory, and this was over a century ago. The only reason that this is not common knowledge, is because Pastuer was excellent at marketing himself and had plenty of political ties.

So What Does This All Mean?

To put it simply, we have all been duped.

We all have a insanely huge amount of bacteria, fungi and parasites living on and inside of us, and these are usually capable of consuming or eliminating toxins that we are exposed to. But when these toxins or irritants (like EMF) become too much to handle the healthy tissue is damaged, and this damaged tissue mutates into a virus and this virus begins working overtime to make up for toxins the bacteria cannot eliminate. Once the toxins are eliminated, these mutated tissues (viruses) are able to become healthy tissue once again.

All disease is the result of toxic waste buildup in your system, and the more bullshit you put into your body, the more you are helping create an optimum environment for the normal tissue in your body, to mutate into a ‘virus’.

Simple bacterial forms like streptococci (pus germs) could be made to assume all of the characteristics of pnuemococci (pneumonia germs) simply by feeding them on pneumonia virus and making other minor modifications in their environment. And when Rosenow reversed the procedure and fed pneumonia germs on pus, the quickly changed into streptococci. Many other expirements we carried on, and, in every instance, the germs, regardless of type, changed into other types when their food and environment were altered. – Journal of Inefctious Diseases 14: 1-32 (1914)

“In other words, Rosenow found that various strains of bacteria “or what one might call sub-sub species of them, could when suitably treated, become any of the other strains.” – Walene James: Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth 41

It is impossible for you to constantly treat your body like shit, then just get vaccines and be healthy.

But there are more factors here besides what you put in your body…

The Nocebo

We all know we should eat healthy, avoid sugar, exercise and have a positive mindset. This has been talked about by countless different people and I am pretty sure everyone knows that it is a good healthy way to live.

This morning I was watching the series on Netflix called Legion and during the intro they started talking about placebo and nocebo.

Placebo is basically when your mind induces healing after taking something (like medication) that is inert (a sugar pill) with the belief that it will help a condition.

Nocebo is the exact same thing but instead of producing a positive healing effect, it is negative and usually not desired.

Legion 2X03 Nocebo effect

There is often very much truth presented to us under the guise of fiction in television and movies. This should show that fear is definitely contagious.

This coincides with the Coronavirus pandemic extremely well, and really makes me wonder what is actually going on with this whole thing (If as many people are really getting sick as we have read).

I would just point out that numerous toxins are constantly sneaking their way into our body through things like processed foods, chemtrails, vaccines, pesticides, and even in organic food and water. I for one know that an average person definitely has quite the buildup of toxins from these sources. Add to that the exposure practically everyone of us are being exposed to constantly.

There is even evidence to show that our healthy bacteria can be mutated by UV light, I wouldn’t think it is too far off to assume that they could be mutated using other forms of light, like the light coming off your cell phone or television…

Mme. Victor Henri, the lady bacteriologist, has made one of the most important discoveries in the branch of research for many years. She has, by subjecting bacteria to the action of ultra-violet rays, succeeded in creating a new species of bacteria from a species already known. The experiment was made with the antrax bacillus, which from a rod-shape was transformed into a spherical coccus. – The Daily News of London: April, 8 1914

Then you throw in the whole nocebo thing and it seems we have a huge cocktail for all kinds of problems, just like what is happening all over the world right now.

Thanks for reading everyone, be sure to check out the next in the series… and don’t be afraid of your neighbours.

So I have addressed the Germ Theory in the previous articles, now it is time to shed some light on probably the most profitable portion of the entire thing, Vaccination.

If you haven’t read the first two in the series, be sure to read those.

In 2017, Pharmacuetical company GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) pulled in $7.16 Billion, besting Merck’s $6.5 billion, Sanofi’s $6.25 billion and Pfizer’s $6 billion. That comes to a total of $25.91 BILLION and this isn’t even all of the companies making them, just the top few.

The amount of “recommended” vaccines is increasing practically every year.

Now by age 2 a child can recieve a total of up to 27. 2

By the age of 18, the recommended number of vaccines is 51. 2

As a medical man I look upon vaccination as an insult to common sense, as superstitious in its origin, unscientific in theory and practice, and useless and dangerous in its character. – Dr Walter Hawden

All ‘conspiracy theories’ aside… This is a very lucrative business to be in, and it is important to consider the main goal of a corporation, and that is to continously increase profits. To survive.

It is very important to understand, that when a corporation is created, it becomes it’s own legal entity. By definition… a person 2

This means that they get a few benefits compared to you or me if being tried in court. What I am mainly getting at here is that no matter what this person 2 (corporation) does, it’s likely nobody will ever go to jail. At least not in the United States or Europe.

But this is a whole different article, so let’s get back to Vaccines.

The “Official” History On Vaccines

According to the “official” story…

It is all reported to have started back in 1796 with Edward Jenner and his discovery of a way to vaccinate for smallpox. Jenner reportedly noticed that milkmaids tending to cows never got smallpox after they had been infected with cowpox. Cowpox usually was a lot milder of a disease in humans compared to smallpox which caused severe skin eruptions and dangerous fevers in humans.

On May 14, 1796, Jenner took some puss that was squeezed out of a lesion on Sarah Nelms Hand (Actual Picture Above) and scratched it into the skin of 8 year old boy James Phipps, it is reported that a single blister rose up on the spot, but that James soon recovered. Then on July 1, Jenner inoculated the boy again, this time with smallpox matter, and no disease developed. Then doctors all over Europe soon adopted Jenner’s ‘innovative’ technique

The REAL History Of Vaccines (Variolation or Inoculation)

The facts here are that the original name for vaccination wasn’t always vaccination, the name was changed fairly recently after Jenner was PUT into the spotlight for his work . The original names for vaccination were variolation and inoculation.

The earliest hints of the practice of inoculation for smallpox in China come during the 10th century. The Chinese also practiced the oldest documented use of variolation, dating back to the fifteenth century.

They implemented a method of “nasal insufflation” administered by blowing powdered smallpox material, usually scabs, up the nostrils. – Wikipedia: Vaccine

Understanding what I do now about the immune system, I feel like this insufflation method of administration could actually work like they’re supposed to, or at least better than the ones they use today. But the main point here is that vaccination is usually believed to be a fairly recent technology, but in fact it actually appears as if it’s been around for literally a millennium .

There are letters dating back to the 1600’s that were published in 1722 that describe variolation, but the first publication of these letters was in 1714.

It wasn’t until Dr. Emmanuel Timoni of Constantinople promoted the practice that variolation began its spread through Western Europe. After coming across the practice in Constantinople, Timoni wrote a letter describing the method in detail which was later published in the Philosophical Transactions in early 1714.

But that wouldn’t be enough to make this a mainstream thing, they needed to somehow get the public on board.

The First Use Of A “Celebrity” To Promote Variolation (Vaccination)

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, was wife to the British ambassador to Turkey, a letter writer and a poet. It is said that she was a smallpox survivor but the disease left her face disfigured, and that she lost her brother to the disease.

While in Turkey she came across the process of variolation as it was practiced amongst the people of Constantinople. She first mentioned variolation in the famous letter to her friend, Sarah Chiswell, in April 1717. in which she enthusiastically recounted the process, which in Constantinople was most commonly administered by experienced elderly women. In 1718, she had the practice conducted on her five-year-old son, Edward Montagu. The procedure was supervised by the embassy doctor Charles Maitland 1.

On her return to England, she had her four-year-old daughter inoculated in the presence of physicians of the royal court in 1721. Both variolations proved successful. Later on that year Maitland conducted an experimental inoculation of six prisoners within the Newgate Prison of London. In the experiment, six condemned prisoners were variolated and later exposed to smallpox with the promise of freedom if they survived. The experiment was a success, and soon variolation was drawing attention from the royal family, who helped promote the procedure throughout England. However, variolation caused the death of Prince Octavius of Great Britain, eighth son and thirteenth child of King George in 1783.

This is the official story on Wikipedia, although according to a publication on NCBI, only 1 of the 6 was actually exposed to smallpox.

the procedure was tested on six condemned prisoners who were promised amnesty if they survived. They all survived; one of them was even exposed to patients with active smallpox to demonstrate immunity. – The myth of the medical breakthrough: smallpox, vaccination, and Jenner reconsidered. 6

This may seem irrelevant, but I think it should be noted that Wikipedia is KNOWN to change whatever it sees fit, in order to purvey a narrative.

Continuing…

This was just the push the “medical establishment” needed in order to gain support from the people. But I think the most important part is what happened after this whole publicity stunt. The process needed to be perceived as something that wasn’t able to be done by just anyone, so they had to introduce a few extra steps in order to be able to cash in on it.

Despite opposition, variolation established itself as a mainstream medical treatment across England. Part of its success was founded on statistical observation, which confirmed that variolation was a safer alternative to contracting smallpox naturally, strengthened by the assumption that it protected against the disease for life. The major faults of variolation lay within its simplicity. Doctors sought to monopolize the simple treatment by convincing the public that the procedure could only be done by a trained professional. The procedure was now preceded by a severe bloodletting, in which the patient was bled, often to faintness, in order to ‘purify’ the blood and prevent fever. Doctors also began to favor deep incisions, which also discouraged amateurs. – Wikipedia: Variolation 1

This is a good example of the medical system manipulating their patients in order to cash in on it as much as possible, without regard to the patients.

I’m fairly certain the only reason that variolation isn’t usually mentioned when discussing the real history of vaccines is because it got a really bad reputation in the years leading up to Jenner.

Jenner is portrayed as a hero because he saved an 8 year old boy from smallpox. But there’s a little more to be said about “Dr” Edward Jenner.

“Dr.” Edward Jenner

More often than not, when looking into this fellow. He is portrayed as the father of vaccines, and a hero. Way back in 1796, he did after all, save that 8 year old boy, James Phipps.

But this wasn’t the full story. Jenner was actually inoculated when HE was an 8 year old boy. So I’m not even sure whether or not I should believe it…

In 1757, an 8-year-old boy was inoculated with smallpox in Gloucester; he was one of thousands of children inoculated that year in England. The procedure was effective, as the boy developed a mild case of smallpox and was subsequently immune to the disease. His name was Edward Jenner. – NCBI: Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox vaccination 2

This is strange because in all the official places (Wikipedia), this is completely overlooked. He didn’t just magically come up with this “breakthrough” at all. He was just the first to call this process vaccination .

Another pretty important and completely overlooked part of Jenner’s story is that he didn’t even pass the tests needed to get his medical degree. He purchased it (which apparently was so common back then that Wikipedia doesn’t mention it at all) and then applied to Oxford using that purchased degree.

Jenner did not take any examinations to receive his medical degree, but purchased a medical degree in 1792, from a Scottish University, the University of St. Andrews, and subsequently would apply for a degree from Oxford University, which he was granted – NewWorldEncyclopedia 2, Encyclopedia of Public Health 2002

As far as I’m concerned, this guy is a fraud just like Pastuer. The reason that the terms variolation and vaccination were seperated is because there was quite a bit of controversy associated with variolation and the “celebrities” known for the practice.

So how did it become mainstream?

Cotton Mather and Dr. Zabdiel Boylston

Cotton Mather was a reverend who was very interested in science and medicine. A ship from the West Indies brought a boatload of people that were sick with smallpox, and Mather had heard of variolation, so he wrote a letter and requested it immediately, the only doctor that responded was Boylston.

Mather, a graduate of Harvard College, was always very interested in science and medicine. When a ship from the West Indies carried persons sick with smallpox into Boston in 1721, an epidemic broke out in Boston and other parts of Massachusetts. Mather wrote a cautious letter recommending immediate variolation. However, he persuaded only Dr. Boylston. With Mather’s support, Boylston immediately started a variolation program and continued to inoculate many volunteers, despite many adversaries in both the public and the medical community in Boston. As the disease spread, so did the controversy around Mather and Boylston (12). At the height of the epidemic, a bomb was thrown into Mather’s house.

Now I’m going to emphasize that last sentence again…

At the height of the epidemic, a bomb was thrown into Mather’s house.

Why you ask?

It was because variolation had already had a reputation for spreading disease and killing lots of people even before he brought it to the “New World”.

In Europe, where the medical profession was relatively organized, the new methods of variolation became known quickly among physicians. Since there was also a demand for protection against smallpox, physicians soon began the variolation procedure on a massive scale. Although 2% to 3% of variolated persons died from the disease, became the source of another epidemic, or suffered from diseases (e.g., tuberculosis and syphilis) transmitted by the procedure itself, variolation rapidly gained popularity among both aristocratic and common people in Europe. – NCBI: Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox vaccination 2

The publication goes on to say that the death rate was 10 times lower than it was for people that contracted the disease naturally, but I will bring common sense and logic to the table.

If this was SO MUCH better than contracting the disease naturally, then why the hell would people throw a bomb into Mather’s house?!

They didn’t have hospitals with computers and internet to properly document probably even 10% (being generous) of the actual number of natural smallpox cases. I know that I didn’t go rushing to the hospital to report that I had the flu, or food poisoning, or anything else for that matter unless i literally had bones sticking out of my body.

The publication goes on further to say that after the whole bomb incident, they decided it was time to do an actual study comparing the case-fatality rates for variolated smallpox and natural smallpox. This study was done during “The Great” epidemic of 1721. Keep in mind that the bomb was reportedly thrown into his house at the height of this epidemic.

To make their point, Mather and Boylston used a statistical approach to compare the mortality rate of natural smallpox infection with that contracted by variolation. During the great epidemic of 1721, approximately half of Boston’s 12,000 citizens contracted smallpox. The fatality rate for the naturally contracted disease was 14%, whereas Boylston and Mather reported a mortality rate of only 2% among variolated individuals. This may have been the first time that comparative analysis was used to evaluate a medical procedure. – NCBI: Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox vaccination 2

So, a boat arrives in 1721 in Boston, and with it a smallpox epidemic. During this epidemic, Mather contacts Boylston, gets him to variolate tons of people, after this a bomb is thrown into his house, then they decide they need to actually do the work and figure out the statistics. ALL IN 1721!

This does not seem like a long enough time to figure out the actual case-fatality rates, and if it were truly as good as it sounded, then nobody would have bombed the damn reverends house. He would have been praised as a bringer of life, or whatever.

The New World Vaccination

So from all of this unmentioned backstory that I have outlined here, variolation was brought to the New World about 70 years before Jenner came along with vaccination (variolation evolved!) and the only reason the name was changed into something other than variolation, was simply to usher it into a new era.

To disguise it. I’m sure the older population faught kicking and screaming to the new generation and described the horrors of variolation. But under this new name, the younger generation welcomed it with open arms.

In the next in this series I will outline the MANY instances where mandatory vaccination has been enforced around the globe world, and the repurcusions that came along with it.

Maybe we can actually prevent this from happening again, we are at a crucial point in history with all this coronavirus nonsense…

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply